Accuracy of the Consciousness Calibration Research Technique
By Scott Jeffrey and Andrew Colyer
Summary: The degree of accuracy of the Consciousness Calibration Research Technique (muscle testing within the context of Dr Hawkins’ Map of Consciousness) is influenced by (or correlated to) the level of consciousness of the testing team.
Introduction: Whereas it was originally stated that anyone over 200 (Courage) can use the Consciousness Calibration Research Technique (CCRT), accuracy varies greatly depending upon the testing team’s calibrated level of consciousness (LoC). As one might assume, the degree of accuracy increases as the LoC of the testing team increases.
The Testing Team: This study was focused on two people using the CCRT, not a self-tester. Here are some of the actual statements used in researching this topic:
- There is a threshold LoC needed to obtain consistent, accurate results with CCRT. TRUE
- The LoC of the Tester affects the accuracy of the results of CCRT. TRUE
- [On more than one occasion, we did not get permission to ask about the LoC of the Testee.]
- The collective calibration of the team affects the accuracy of CCRT results. TRUE
- Both the Tester and Testee must have the intention of focusing on the Truth and the Hawkins Map of Consciousness to obtain accurate, consistent results with the CCRT. TRUE
- Because the physiologic response in the context of this work calibrates at 605, when the testing is being done, the team functions as one unit. TRUE
The results concluded that the relevant calibration with respect to degree of accuracy was the collective calibration of the team, so both the tester and the testee seem to be a factor in the degree of accuracy of CCRT results.
Degree of Accuracy: The following levels of accuracy were calibrated at the following LoC:
At Level 200, the level of accuracy, consistent results with CCRT is 70%.
At Level 250, the level of accuracy, consistent results with CCRT is 70.6%.
At Level 310, the level of accuracy, consistent results with CCRT is 71%.
At Level 350, the level of accuracy, consistent results with CCRT is 77%.
At Level 400, the level of accuracy, consistent results with CCRT is 80%.
At Level 500, the level of accuracy, consistent results with CCRT is 94%.
At Level 540, the level of accuracy, consistent results with CCRT is 96%.
At Level 600, the level of accuracy, consistent results with CCRT is 99%.
At Level 900, the level of accuracy, consistent results with CCRT is 99.9%.
At Level 1000, the level of accuracy, consistent results with CCRT is 100%.
Conclusions: Although the testing results of a research team at calibrated level 200 will likely be statistically significant (70%), there’s still a high degree of error and inconsistency in results. One can also observe from the graph above that there’s a considerable jump in accuracy between LoC 400 and 500. The higher the collective LoC of the testing team, the more accurate and consistent results the team achieves. There are numerous factors influencing accuracy at any particular level. For example, testing the statement, “At LoC 500, the 6% error rate is due to potentially 25 different factors” yields a TRUE response. Some of these factors include unconscious positionalities and “switching.” Further research is required to determine all the major factors and perhaps to create a protocol to increase CCRT accuracy.
July 2007
